|
From: Monica_Lodygensky@weforum.org
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:39:36 +0100
To: matt.taylor@matttaylor.com, gail.taylor@knowhereinc.com
Cc: Katja_Wittwer@weforum.org, Maurizio_Travaglini@weforum.org,
Etienne_Eichenberger@weforum.org
Subject: An Update on the Education and Environment Workshops
Dear Matt and Gail,
Based on the scrip that you have proposed for the workshops, I
have tried to come up with a simplified version (excluding the multimedia
interventions). Based on the 90 minutes available, I have also tried
to allocate the timing for the various steps of the process and
I would appreciate your feedback as soon as possible. The process
can seem a bit complicated and I am a bit worried if there is going
to be enough time for it all.
Concerning the experts to be involved, you will see in the structures
enclosed that I foresee no more than 3 testimonials at the beginning
of the session. Would you still like to contact all the people confirmed
(these people are indicated with ** in the structures) concerning
input for the multimedia purposes?
Here are the structures for the Education and Environment Workshops,
as well as some comments linked with each of them:
Education Workshop: (See attached file: Education workshop.doc)
Here, I see as the main goal to leverage the already existing Global
Education Initiative and Global Action Plan which Oxfam will help
to structure. I have already send the preliminary structure to Bryer's
office and informed them that you would like to contact them for
input. The contact person in his office is called John McGrath (jmagrath@oxfam.org).
He hasn't come back to me yet but please feel free to get in touch
with him. I kindly ask you to copy me on your emails to him. My
colleague handling John Chambers will have a conference call with
his office this afternoon. She will brief them about the development
of the workshop and tell me whether Cisco would like to provide
input and be closely involved in the process. We will also ask President
Chissano to give a testimonial about the situation in his region.
My colleague handling Carleton Fiorina (same person as for Chamers)
will also follow up with her office today for a final answer. If
she confirms, we would also need to give her a more active role.
She is one of the co-Chairpersons of the Annual Meeting. I would
propose that she does the closing remarks...
Environment Workshop: (See attached file: Environment-workshop.doc)
Here, the goal is much more challenging. The Climate Change negotiations
are at a deadlock (there is too much disagreement linked with the
Kyoto Protocol) and I don't expect us to come up with a solution
in 90 minutes. I see the goal rather to give a spark for innovative
strategies of how to proactively address the issue while waiting
for a future international framework. Minister Pronk, who I consider
a key player is still not confirmed, but I have spoken to the Norwegian
Prime Minister's office and they are keen to be involved. I have
sent them the preliminary structure and I plan to hook you up with
them as soon as I hear back from them. My colleague handling Sir
John Browne of BP has also contacted them to check if BP would be
interested in being more closely involved. I plan contact one of
the experts confirmed (Esty, Frankel, Bode) and see whether one
of them would be interested in stating some of the facts of climate
change as a testimonial at the beginning. As I do this, I will also
mention that you would like to get in touch for input purposes.
How does all this sound to you? Maybe we could organize a conference
call this tomorrow or on Friday to discuss this in a more detailed
manner...
Best wishes,
Monica -----
Forwarded by Monica Lodygensky/World Economic Forum on 10/01/2001
11:41 ----- Katja Wittwer
To: Beatrice Wertli/World Economic Forum, 09/01/2001 Etienne Eichenberger/World
Economic Forum, Monica 16:20 Lodygensky/World Economic Forum, Pamela
Hartigan/World Economic Forum@WEF cc: Maurizio Travaglini/World
Economic Forum
Subject: Urgent - template message to be sent out to your workshop
panellists a.s.a.p (Embedded image moved (Embedded image moved to
file: pic31906.pcx) to file: pic25987.pcx)
Maurizio has asked me to get Matt and Gail`s input for a template
message to your experts/panellists in their workshops. Here it is!
It needs your action now!
Please fill in the blanks, (or forward it to the WEF-contact of
your expert for mailing) and send it out a.s.a.p. to all your experts
confirmed for that workshop. Please cc Matt and Gail (matt.taylor@matttaylor.com,
gail.taylor@knowhereinc.com) and bcc Maurizio and myself. If you
have any contact info (private email, direct phone, etc.) of your
expert that is not in Agora, please forward it to me - I will compile
a contact-phone list for M&G Matt and Gail have to get in touch
with the experts before the end of the week and need their material
urgently for the slide show. I am sorry for the delay, but I had
to wait for the reply from California...... best Katja
Dear Mr/Mrs XXX
Thank you for taking an active role in the Annual Meeting Workshop
on XXXXXXXX (add official workshop title) As our workshop facilitators
Matt and Gail Taylor are designing the workshop, we would greatly
appreciate your involvement in the design process. The new IdeasLab
Workshops will bring you as a key expert together with other decision
makers to share knowledge and experiences. Workshop participants
will work with information on the workshop theme that will be displayed
on walls and will be projected in an introductory multimedia-slideshow.
Your role as an expert is crucial in designing this information
to be displayed. We would like to ask you to provide pertinent themes
and materials for the workshop including your own work where relevant.
The multimedia-slide show will present your work and your thoughts
on the topic to the participants and will be the basis for the discussion.
In order to coordinate your input and to involve you in the workshop
design Matt and Gail Taylor will get directly in touch with you
by email or phone within the next days.
Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Yours sincerely, XXX
From: anne.simon@ch.pwcglobal.com
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 23:51:09 +0100
To: courrier@iway.fr et al.
Subject: World Economic Forum - Annual Meeting 2001
Message from the World Economic Forum
Dear Forum Fellow
In an effort to enhance the content of the Annual Meeting at Davos
and help participants prepare for sessions, the World Economic Forum
and PricewaterhouseCoopers have been working together to develop
an innovative knowledge website.
The result is "KnowledgeConcierge". Offering somewhat fuller versions
of actual program descriptions, it will also provide a State of
the Question essay of about 400 words on each topic covered in our
sessions. As a further enrichment, it will provide pre-selected
links to key online resources in the topic area. And finally, it
will offer a Personal Query service: all participants in sessions,
including session moderators and speakers, will be able to enquire
for points of information or broad perspectives related to panel
topics. The responses developed by a KnowledgeConcierge research
team will be returned to enquirers within specified time frames,
ranging from a few hours for urgent enquiries to longer periods
of time.
The site will be on line and available to moderators and speakers
from January 15th forward, to assist them in finalizing their presentations.
It will be available to all participants during the conference itself,
from terminals located at the two Internet Business Centers inside
the Congress Centre.
We would warmly appreciate your support for this innovative site.
The KnowledgeConcierge Content Manager, Larry Yu, will contact you
shortly to ask you whether you would be willing to take time to
review and revise, where needed, the 400-word essays already prepared
in your area of expertise.
Best regards
Malte Godbersen
Anne Simon
Director, Knowledge Management Director, Business Development
World Economic Forum
PricewaterhouseCoopers
From: Pamela Hartigan
Date: December 19, 2000
To: Matt and Gail
Subject: Social Entrepreneurs workshop
Dear Gail and Matt,
I have been asked by the World Economic Forum to respond to your
request for information on the workshop "Facilitating Social Entrepreneurship"
to be held on Tuesday, January 30, at Davos. Below is the "blurb"
I wrote to describe this workshop
Theme: Facilitating Social Entrepreneurship: How do you nurture
it? Social entrepreneurs create social value through finding innovative
solutions to social problems. Many work despite multiple financial,
legislative and social barriers. How can local, national and global
programs and policies foster or hinder the development of social
entrepreneurship? How can global social investors support, and learn
from, social entrepreneurs and their organizations? This is an opportunity
to learn about these issues, and others, from the experts: Social
Entrepreneurs themselves!
Participants: Bill Drayton, Founder and President of Ashoka, USA;
Jim Pitofsky, President and CEO of Sea Change, USA; Youssou N'Dour,
Singer, has a project in Digital Divide, Senegal
I must confess I am intrigued by your proposed methodology. It
sounds like it will not only be productive but fun. However, I am
a bit puzzled as to what the role of the participants might be given
the structure of your Group Genius workshop. It would be good to
know what one might tell them to expect, and whether in fact their
role is different from the other workshop participants.
Perhaps as a first introduction it might be helpful to give you
some examples of stellar social entrepreneurship (these are for
your own information, not for sharing with others as we in the Schwab
Foundation are in an Award selection mode and we don't want people
to think that we have pre-determined who will get the Award).
SEWA, India
The Self-Employed Women's Association (SEWA) is a union of 220,000
women workers in the Indian informal sector. Although such workers
constitute 93% of the Indian workforce, they have no welfare benefits,
such as pensions or health insurance. To counteract this vulnerability,
Ela Bhatt founded SEWA 25 years ago. She encouraged very poor women
to lead their own groups and union. As a result, 4,000 women each
contributed a day's worth of their earnings as capital for a SEWA
Bank. Today, that Bank has 125,000 depositors and a working capital
of over US$ 7 million. By 1995, SEWA members numbered 218,700 making
it the largest single union in India. SEWA has also formed its own
health co-operative, the first of its kind, with an annual turnover
of 10 million Indian rupees. Elected representatives of the shareholders
who are midwives and health workers themselves earning their living
from the co-operative run it. The SEWA model is one that other communities
in developing countries have sought to adapt. As a result of SEWA's
efforts, the Women in Informal Employment Globalizing and Organizing
(WIEGO) was formed.
Community of Versalles, Colombia
Ten years ago, the community of Versalles in Colombia was devastated
economically and socially as a result of plunging coffee prices,
skyrocketing rates of violence and illicit drug cultivation. Henry
Valencia, the town doctor, Claudio de Jesus Gonzalez, the mayor,
and a number of community leaders came together to puzzle over what
could be done. Through town meetings, the community identified its
problem as a lack of a market base and no reliable source of income.
Below the surface lay a more worrisome reality: people felt helpless.
Young and old alike were nudged to contribute and commit. Through
micro enterprise and agricultural development, Versalles today is
a thriving, healthy and proud community of 15,000. The Versalles
success story has inspired many communities throughout Latin America
to follow suit and become "Healthy Municipalities for Peace".
"Duck Rice", Japan
A Japanese farmer, Mr. Furuno, has developed and spread a sustainable
agricultural system. Farming only 2.8 hectares of land, his sole
inputs are rice husk plus duck and poultry manure. All his cultivation
is done with ducks, which also provide fertiliser and insect control.
His produce, duck and duck eggs, rice, "duck rice", vegetables and
poultry, is sold directly to more than 100 customer families who
live not far from his farm. He earns US$160,000 a year from 0.6
hectares of rice and 1.8 hectares of vegetables. The profitability
of the enterprise is such that he was able to leave it for several
months each year to travel abroad to South East Asia, wherever rice
is grown, teaching others about the system. As a result of his work,
there are whole valleys in Korea and the Philippines filled with
young farmers using the duck/rice system. The growers using the
system are making enough money to send their children to university
and to travel overseas.
As you can see from these examples, social entrepreneurs are individuals
and their organizations driven by social goals ? financial gains
are a means of getting there. They are not charities, and don't
look to charities for their funding. And they are not just "socially
responsible business people". Social entrepreneurs work largely
unnoticed in the global community, providing goods and services
that "The Market" doesn't put a price tag on. Clean air, sustainable
farming practices, healthy lives free of violence, empowerment of
women? and so on? Social entrepreneurs are people who create enterprises
that benefit people, and then they figure out how to make these
enterprises pay for themselves. Like business entrepreneurs, social
entrepreneurs are "can do" people who view the world through different
lenses. They see connections and opportunities others don't, take
risks others won't, and energize those around them to achieve what
seemed impossible. They are practical, not ideologues.
Now, the panelists:
Bill Drayton ? information on him and his amazing organization
can be accessed on www.ashoka.org
Jim Pitofsky ? Founded Sea Change in 1999. For the past 3 years
served as the Vice President and then Acting President of Echoing
Green Foundation where he initiated and managed strategic, entprepreneurial
alliances with businesses, philanthropists, foundations, government
agencies and Fellows and provided and coordinated training and technical
support to 300 social entrepreneurs. He has worked toward social
change in education and law (disability, civil rights, education
and death penalty) through the ACLU, Skadden, the NY Lawyers for
Public Interest and Advocates for Children) and has been actively
involved in community organizing and public policy issues concerning
people with disabilities, communities of color, low income communities
and migrant farm workers.
Kumi Naidoo ? a Rhodes scholar with degrees in politics and law.
Secretary General and CEO of CIVICUS, an international alliance
dedicated to strengthening citizen action and civil society throughout
the world. Includes more than 500 nongovernmental organizations,
associations, private foundations, corporation, other civil societa
organizations. Has been active in the anti-apartheid movement since
age 15. After being released from prison as a political prisoner,
he went underground for nearly a year before fleeing the country
due to persistent police harrassment. After the release of Nelson
Mandela in 1990, Kumi returned to South Africa to help set up the
ANC as a legal political party. He came to CIVICUS from his position
as the founding Executive Director of the South Afican National
NGO coalition, the umbrella agency for the NGO community in South
Africa.
Youssou N'Dour ? information on him can be accessed on www.africana.com
/tt_148.htm
Hope this is not bombarding you too much. Look forward to our discussion
tomorrow on the conference call with the World Economic Forum staff.
Pamela Hartigan
Managing Director The Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship
From: Maurizio.Travaglini@weforum.org
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 2:49 PM
To: Matt Taylor; gail.taylor@knowherestore.com
Cc: Katja_Wittwer@weforum.org
Subject: RE: Davos is coming !
Matt: WOW....I really like your "script", the way you describe
the Group genius...I wish it was already happening.... I am very
excited...also because I am already learning from you and Gail.
Fantastic ! I trust your "understanding, design, science and art"
! They will all come together in Davos.
Let me add a few comments and many question marks to give you additional
background:
- I would like to make the sessions last longer (I wanted to do
2 hours) but making sessions longer has an impact on the people
attending, as they are framed in a programme where all sessions
start/end at the same time. I am not sure we will be able to find
a good solution!
- I think people in general start entering the room 10 minutes
before the beginning, I am not sure we can change that (operations
will tell us)
- I like the idea of the roving reporter....I wonder if Katja
or the program manager could be that person as I am not sure we
can host additional people (hotel rooms are always a problem in
Davos)
- "Relevant" names might expect some sort of role in the session
(at the beginning, in the course, at the end?) as they appear in
the program as actively participating in shaping the sessions. I
wonder if that could be built in the session. For instance: experts
in the environment or CEO's who implemented best practices on sustainable
operations, might be "story tellers"
- the script, could be built together with some of those experts
- I guess Monica & Etienne will come out with a list very soon
- some of the glossary might be adapted to the existing context?
we have limited time to create a common feeling / understanding,
align on rules...should we find a language more accessible to CEO's
(stiff people?). My comments are based on assumptions, I have been
in Davos once...as a consultant. So, you can take my cards (the
good ones and the "question mark" ones" and run with them). Last
but not least: all the additional requirements we can manage. The
workshops will be the most amazing part of the Annual Meeting.
mau
From:Matt Taylor
Date: December 11, 2000
To: Maurizio Travaglini
Subject: RE: Davos is coming!
cc: Katja_Wittwer@weforum.org
Maurizio...
What follows is a model that Gail and I developed over the weekend.
It incorporates an entire process the session, itself, being but
one aspect of the experience. The time required for this - in it's
present iteration - is an hour and an half per session. It can be
reduced to and hour and fifteen minutes but this starts to squeeze
things and adds risk to the process. We would like you to see if
the sessions could be extended by 15 minutes.
As Gail mentioned in our last phone dialog, we do not facilitate
meetings we facilitate the creative process and promote sustained
Group Genius. By definition, creativity is unpredictable and emergent.
It cannot be made to happen. However, it is a relatively simple
matter to make an environment that consistently promotes the creative
response in individuals and groups. This environment - not surprisingly
- functions at 180 degrees to the typical environment. This environment
is made up, of course, of the physical space, the tool set and the
work process employed. No work process is neutral. It is an embedded
epistemology. No physical environment is neutral - for good or back
every environment is rich in both symbols and constraints. Likewise
no tool is lacking in power. These things are coherent and promote
emergence or fail to do so. facilitating creativity involves both
art and science.
The essence of our method is based on the discovery that the arena
where creativity is desired cannot be managed. The environment must
be managed. The subject in focus must remain free and uncontaminated.
Context must be brought to the exercise and discipline to the process.
The participants in the Group Genius process must have the maximum
freedom from self-destructing and limiting architectural constructs
be they physical, mental, emotional. Everyone has to go to that
child-like space of timeless, suspended play.
Creativity and spontaneous emergent behavior is provoked when several
things happen in unison:
- A different question is asked within a different conceptual
frame.
- Multiple iterations of work are performed in a compressed time
period.
- Several levels of organizational recursion are employed.
- A feedback driven process is working in real-time.
- The physical environment is saturated with stimulating, ideas,
images, symbols and objects.
- Participants have the adequate opportunity to self organize
and pursue/express their interests.
- The rules of engagement are simple and the playing field level
for all.
- There are no hidden agendas.
- The work is approached as play.
- Big issues are at stake and this has been made clear.
- The entire cycle of work is performed each iteration (Scan,
Focus, Act).
- A high level of cognitive dissonance exists or is injected at
the beginning.
It is the density and interaction between these conditions that
creates an environment conducive to passion, breakthrough and solid
engineering. Creativity is not only a cerebral exercise of information
exchange and reasoning - it is visceral, heuristic, messy and sensory.
It requires the full employment of many vantage points, skill sets,
experiences, desires, cognitive styles - all in intense dialog.
The challenge we gave ourselves is to create these conditions employing
the framework you have given us. Creativity can and does emerge
at any place and time. The problem is that it is usually accidental.
This accidental aspect can be removed by creating the right environment.
This is the principle that drives the design of our environments
and the tools and processes used within them.
When Gail and I design any process we seek to incorporate all of
these elements. The science is in the understanding. The engineering
is in the design. The art is in how the play is conducted in real
time.
The following design does this. It's preparation will take a concerted
effort on all of our parts. In each of these sessions, about two
person weeks of human time will be invested by the participants.
If we do not get an extraordinary result, we will have wasted that
time. If we do not get a result that is the synergy of all their
individual contributions, we violate the justification of bringing
them together. If we do not provide them with a powerful emotional
experience, nothing will come of the work produced - it will crash
on the rocks of a cold reality.
Their experience will be composed of 7 movements:
a) The Legend is Read
b) A Hunter/Gatherer Walk About
c) Teams Form (tables)
d) Teams Create and Read A Story (in a prescribed order)
e) Individuals Make Their Glass Beads
f) Each Plays Their Beads (on the Future History Wall)
g) A Fair Witness Reports (what has emerged)
In this exercise, nothing is normal. This is not a meeting. It
is an experience. It is time compressed - participants have to respond
- spontaneously - in real time. All interactions and dialog are
focused on a specific challenge producing a time-constrained deliverable.
The process moves very fast - through 6 iterations. There is not
time to "think" - that comes later. This is one big, structured
brain-storm that leads to a surprising conclusion: a scenario to
the year 2020 composed of Major Events, Obstacles, Tipping Point
Projects and the Role each participant will play.
THE ROOM: For description purposes, assume a square room with a
center door on the south side. In the sw corner is an internet-connected
Kiosk. In the se corner is the facilitator's location. On the south
and west walls are knowledge "objects" - several hundred quotes,
articles, pictures, models, etc. - the walls are covered. The north
wall is blank and set up for scribing. The east wall is formatted
into a time line - 2001 through 2020. In the center are 8 round
tables forming a square donut. There is a sound system and a projector
aimed at the north wall (focused to cover as much of it as possible).
The room has a dimmer switch. Participants remain outside the room
(the door is closed) until just before the beginning - they are
asked to come in a find a seat (random order - no place names).
THE LEGEND: Participants come in and sit down. The lights dim.
Music and slide show projects on north wall. Strong voice over.
A Legend is told of how the people came to understand the crises
in ____________ (environment - corporate social responsibility -
the education divide) and acted to bring these things to harmony
and stability by 2020. The Legend tells a (archetypical) story,
sets a goal, makes a challenge - it reminds the participants of
their individual and social quest.
WALK ABOUT: The light come back up slowly (brighter than upon entry).
Facilitators briefly explain SCAN and the tradition of Walk About.
The idea of knowledge-worker hunter-gatherers is planted. Participants
are directed to scan the south and west walls and gather knowledge-objects
that appeal to them. This is a silent exercise - a quest. Appropriate
music is playing. The projector is flashing appropriate images on
the north wall. While this is in progress, placards are placed in
the center of each table identifying themes relevant our subject.
Participants are told to find the theme most interesting to them
given the materials they have gathered. The only rule is that every
table has to populated within a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 10
chairs.
A STORY: Participants create a collage of their materials and prepare
a two minute Story within the context of the Legend and their Theme.
One table at a time, they post their collage and report their story.
A graphic scribe draws around the collage of each table's report.
The tables report in a clock-wise order starting with the ne corner.
The Themes progressively add to one another and tell a coherent
tale that integrates the individual Stories. The Legend has been
fleshed out.
Glass Bead Game: Facilitators introduce the Glass Bead Game. At
their respective tables, each individual makes "Beads" to play on
cards that are provided. These cards are different colors - each
representing a different category: Major Events, Obstacles, Tipping
Point Projects and the Role each participant will play (each is
asked to sign this card). Participants post their cards in the appropriate
track and time point on the east wall. Each "cries out" their postings.
FAIR WITNESS: Facilitator articulate the role of the "Fair Witness."
The Fair Witness then retells the Legend synthesizing all the participant's
work. Music fanfare. End. Participants rescan the walls. On the
way out there are handed a card which gives them the URL where their
work will be posted.
GENERAL COMMENTS: The entire session will be taped by a "roving
reporter." The web site will integrate all three sessions: environment,
corporate social responsibility and the education divide pointing
out the synergies that were created.
Gail and I have found that people are in far more agreement than
they think they are. What happen is they "talk" themselves out of
agreement when they come together from different vantage points
employing different languages. The starting Legends (one for each
session) will be a framework. It will preempt the "hidden" design
assumptions that typically block progress. The knowledge-objects
will reveal the state-of-the-art. They will describe what is possible.
Instead of debating in the moment, the participants will be "designing"
over a 20 year period. This provides "room" for things to work out.
Participants will be working with their hands and they will be
moving around. There is no time for didactics. There is no "structure"
at the tables. They have to come from who they really are - not
from position.
While the modern language of business will be used, the structure
of the process goes back to long-practiced indigenous symbols and
processes that people intrinsically respond to. This will help them
tap into their deep beliefs and short circuit all the "reasons"
why progress cannot be made.
The objective is to get a coherent model of an evolving solution
that each can place themselves into. There is more to talk about,
however, I send this now for your response.
Matt
(see Matt's
website for further iterations of this design)
From: Maurizio.Travaglini@weforum.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:43 AM
To: gail.taylor@knowherestore.com; matt.taylor@matttaylor.com
Cc: Katja_Wittwer@weforum.org
Subject: Davos is coming !
Gail, Matt:
First of all let me thank you for accepting our invitation to join
the World Economic Forum in Davos next January. I am really REALLY
excited at the prospect of working TOGETHER ! I would like to introduce
Katja Witter, a Forum Associate who is the main point of contact
for all workshops we will hold in Davos. We will send you tomorrow
all the documentation needed for organizing your stay in Davos.
I would like to start our collaboration by sharing with you some
of the ideas about the workshops. Below is the idea list for the
3 ones that still need to be shaped. Workshops are "owned" by programme
managers who interact with content experts to design both the "cast"
and the "script". For those workshops we have experts collaborating
with us to identify the right focus / desired outcome / cast (CEO's,
representatives from government and academia). This means we will
need a three-way collaboration Program Manager, You, Content Experts.
1. Title: Workshop on Environment, Date: 26.01.2001, Time: 9:00-10:15
Desired outcome (draft): identify a success pattern after the failure
in the Hague and before the next Rio+10 summit. What can companies
do to advance the environmental agenda? Where are the barriers to
agreements? How to overcome them?
2. Title: Workshop on Corporate Social Responsibility - NEW TITLE:
Partnering: Beyond codes of conduct, Date: 29.01.2001, Time: 9:00-10:15
Desired outcome (draft): what best practices can be shared by companies
that "lead" in this field?
3. Title: Bridging the Education Divide, Date: 26.01.2001, Time:
15:00-16:15 Desired outcome (draft): how can new technologies be
leveraged to share knowledge, improve education and standards of
living? How can we achieve "better education" in developing countries
without eradicating the existing culture? what are the "success
stories" that we should share and learn from?
I also discussed with Donna Redel (Head of the Center for the Global
Industries) the possibility to co-design one of the "governor's
meeting". Most of them are already shaped and we have one with a
great team of CEO's confirmed, but no plan. You will see attached
an idea...but it has not been shared/shaped. We will see if we can
shape all or part of it. However, we can work with her to identify
the priorities for this group and design a good program where people
can achieve something meaningful. I understand that the environment
is a major concern and that we could focus on that. Also: the role
of the mining industry in developing countries or the protection
of the workers and communities is an important factor to be considered.
Here a few lines and the list of CEO's.
DAVOS, SWITZERLAND MONDAY 29 JANUARY Preliminary Programme Sessions
will be chaired by Hugh Morgan, Chief Executive Officer, WMC, Australia
Monday 29 Hotel Schweizerhof ArvenstŸbli
12.00-12.30 Reception
12.30-14.30 Session over lunch
Part I Update on the Global Mining Initiative For sound business
reasons, the metals and mining industry in 1999 has launched its
Global Mining Initiative. The project is aimed at helping the industry
and the wider public to understand the role that mining and minerals
can play in making the transition to sustainable patterns of economic
development. Where does that initiative stand? How can the industry
make sure that its efforts are appropriately communicated to the
outside world and get the credit for its efforts? á Sir Robert Wilson,
Executive Chairman, Rio Tinto Plc, United Kingdom á Media Leader
á Bjšrn Stigson, President, World Business Council for Sustainable
Development, Switzerland
14.30-14.45 Break
14.45-16.15 Working Session (change to first agenda point?)
AIDS and its effect on the metal and mining industry The industry
always has been affected by infectious diseases like Tuberculosis
and Malaria. But the spread of AIDS and the increasing number of
new infections with HIV has developed into an apocalyptic dimension.
Beyond the humanitarian catastrophe, making AIDS a truly global
problem to fight, new infections and spread of AIDS has a massive
effect on the metal and mining corporations, severely affecting
the industries workforce. What are the experiences of the industry
with fighting the disease? Are there any new ways to engage the
industry in coordinated efforts to prevent the disease from spreading
further? á Leon H. Sullivan, The Global Sullivan Principles, USA
á Raymond V. Gilmartin, Chairman, Merck & Co.Inc. USA- will appear
in plenary 15:15h) ??? á Patty Stonesifer, Gates Foundation á Anthony
Trahar, Chief Executive Officer, Anglo American Plc, UK
The costs of energy
Energy and the cost thereof is likely to become increasingly important
with respect to a number of producers of the industry. The lack
of capital investment in power over the past decade has implied
that the excess capacity of a decade ago has now been taken up as
demand has increased. With greater demand and no investment as well
as greater limits imposed on coal-fired sources the cost and sourcing
power for smelters is likely to become of greater concern. (Taken
and adapted from Jessica Cross' remarks) Energy
Add point, 1/2h The CEO's agenda item: Where do we go from here?
Where do we want to stand in Davos 2002?
18.15-19.15 Plenary Session of the Annual Meeting Programme Congress
Center
20.00-20.30 Reception and
20.30-22.30 Session over dinner (spouses are cordially invited
to join) Hotel Schweizerhof E-procurement initiatives: creating
value? Review of the progress in E-14 initiative. Assessment of
the value creation in the post-B2B market. á
Mike Gordon, President, Quadrem, USA Arturo T. Acevedo Chairman
ACINDAR SA Argentina Patrice T. Motsepe Executive Chairman AFRICAN
RAINBOW MINERALS (ARM) South Africa Maximilian Aicher Owner and
Director AICHER GROUP Germany Ricardo E. Belda Vice President President
ALCOA USA ALCOA EUROPE. Switzerland Vlatcheslav A. Shtirov President
ALROSA Co Ltd Russia Julian Ogilvie Thompson Chairman ANGLO AMERICAN
PLC United Kingdom Anthony J. Trahar Chief Executive Officer ANGLO
AMERICAN PLC United Kingdom Michael W. Spicer Executive Director
ANGLO AMERICAN CORPORATION OF SOUTH AFRICA LTD South Africa Rick
Menell Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ANGLOVAAL MINING
LIMITED South Africa Vahid Alaghband Chairman BALLI GROUP PLC United
Kingdom Randall Oliphant President and Chief Executive Officer BARRICK
GOLD CORPORATION Canada Baron Paul Buysse Chairman of the Board
NV BEKAERT SA Belgium Baba N. Kalyani Chairman and Managing Director
BHARAT FORGE LIMITED India Francisco Rubiralta Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer CELSA GROUP Spain Maria S.B. Marques Chief Executive
Officer COMPANHIA SIDERURGICA NACIONAL Brazil Juan Villarzu President
and Chief Executive Officer (CODELCO CHILE) CORPORACION NACIONAL
DEL COBRE DE CHILE Chile Ronald N. Mannix Chairman CORIL HOLDINGS
LTD Canada Sergey A Oulin President Vice-President DIAMOND CHAMBER
OF RUSSIA ALROSA Co Ltd Russia Dominique Michel Secretary-General
FABRIMETAL Belgium JŸrgen R. Grossmann Owner and Chief Executive
Officer GEORGSMARIENHUTTE HOLDING GMBH Germany Willy R. Strothotte
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG Switzerland
Mourad Cherif President GROUPE ONA Morocco Dariusz J. Krawiec Chairman
of the Management Board IMPEXMETAL S.A. Poland Pramod Kumar Mittal
Vice-Chairman and Managing Director ISPAT INDUSTRIES LIMITED India
Lakshmi N. Mittal Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ISPAT INTERNATIONAL
N.V. United Kingdom Mohammed A. Naki Chairman KUWAIT INDUSTRIES
CO. HOLDING Kuwait Ronald C. Cambre Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION USA Jean-Pierre Rodier Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer PECHINEY France J. Steven Whisler Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION USA
Jay K. Taylor President and Chief Executive Officer PLACER DOME
INC. CANADA Sir Robert P. Wilson Executive Chairman RIO TINTO PLC
United Kingdom Kim Samuel-Johnson Owner and Director SAMUEL GROUP
OF COMPANIES USA Alexei A. Mordachov General Director SEVERSTAL
Russia Oleg V. Deripaska President SIBIRSKY ALUMINIUM GROUP Russia
Paul Matthys Managing Director SIDMAR NV Belgium Ekkehard Schulz
Chief Executive Officer THYSSEN KRUPP AG Germany Karel Vinck Chief
Executive Officer UNION MINIERE Belgium Richard K. Riederer Chief
Executive Officer WEIRTON STEEL CORPORATION USA Hugh M. Morgan Chief
Executive Officer WMC LIMITED Australia
So: this is the starting point. I would like to stress the fact
that my objective is "successffull experimentation" in 2001 and
then Radical Re-Design for next year. The Annual Meeting is "the
place" to make good things happen, as we have over 1000 business
leaders, 200 representatives from Governments and 200 "experts".
If we improve the way they collaborate on global issues, the impact
will be fantastic. And I believe you are the best partners we could
find to achieve this ambitious purpose.
Next steps: we would like to share with you some additional information
about the room and the formats we discussed. Maybe we could have
a conference call before the end of the week, to start discussing
more in depth the "what" and the "how". Meanwhile any feedback is
appreciated - and please let us know if the registration forms/bookings
give you any problem.
Warmest regards,
mau
Maurizio Travaglini Director, Annual Meeting Programme E-mail:
maurizio.travaglini@weforum.org Tel: + 41 22 869 1237 Fax: + 41
22 786 2744
|