Site Index


Knowledge Base Archive - Iteration 1.0

This page archives messages from the Fourth Quarter 2000. Third Quarter 2000 as well as First and Second Quarter 2001 archive pages are also available.

This page is part of the iterations knowledge management efforts, a centralized repository of e-mail messages containing useful information. If you have correspondance that you would like posted on this page, send a copy to kbase@iterations.com. Mail received at this address will be regularly posted to this page.

Clicking on the Date of the item in the table below will take you down the page to the item.

Please send your comments and ideas as how to further iterate this knowledge management tool.

Note: In January 2002 the funcionality of the iterations eMail Knowledge Base Archive was moved to Yahoo! Groups

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/email_kbase/

If you would like access to this group, send an e-mail message to:

email_kbase-owner@yahoogroups.com

 


Date (yy.mm.dd)
From
To
Subject
00.12.27 Gail Taylor Matt Taylor et al. Smart Office
00.12.22 John T. Poparad Gail Taylor et al. Scenario Material
00.12.19 Todd Johnston Gail Taylor et al. "A Nonlinear Dynamics & Complexity Glossary"
00.12.19 Jeff Johnston Matt Taylor Better Together
00.12.18 Matt Taylor Jeff Johnston How man apes animal medicine
00.12.18 John T. Poparad Gail Taylor Fooled Again
00.12.18 Russ White K Base Experience Economy pdf
00.12.13 Matt Taylor Lisa Piazza et al. RE: Institutional Trust
00.12.12 Lisa Piazza Todd Johnston et al. Institutional Trust
00.12.11 Lisa Piazza Jeff Johnston Knowledge Worker Fodder
00.12.10 Matt Taylor Bill Blackburn et al. www.smart.com
00.12.08 Jeff Johnston Gail Taylor et al. cool mapping sites
00.12.08 Lisa Piazza Knowledge Base http://www.cio.com/forums/healthcare/
00.12.07 Lisa Piazza Knowledge Base Healthcare ... Chaos article
00.12.07 Lisa Piazza Knowledge Base First Round Healthcare links
00.12.06 Jeff Johnston Matt Taylor et al. Micro Cosmos
00.12.06 John T. Poparad Gail Taylor et al. SFI Bulletin
00.12.05 John T. Poparad Gail Taylor et al. Building a Beehive
00.11.30 John T. Poparad Jeff Johnston et al. In the Zero Luck Zone
00.11.30 Lisa Piazza Bill Blackburn et al. Stanford Interactive Workspaces Project
00.11.29 Ann Badillo Gail Taylor et al. Earth Lights - Very cool
00.11.29 Matt Taylor Jeff Johnston Christopher Alexander speaking in SF
00.11.26 Jeff Johnston Matt Taylor et al. Jane Jacobs on cnn.com
00.11.26 Matt Taylor Jeff Johnston Gutenberg Bible headed for Internet
00.11.25 Matt Taylor Russ White and Jeff Johnston Home servers: The new data butlers
00.11.23 Todd Johnston Matt Taylor et al. "Europe Nixes Software Patents"
00.11.18 Gail Taylor Lisa Piazza et al. useful web site (thinkers)
00.11.10 Matt Taylor Bob Taylor et al. Managing Software Engineers
00.11.09 Jeff Johnston Matt Taylor et al. Bounty Quest
00.11.08 Jeff Johnston Matt Taylor et al. Community Design
00.10.27 Jeff Johnston John Joseph et al. FW: 10/27/2000 Daily Report from The Chronicle of Higher Education
00.10.25 Jeff Johnston Ann Badillo and Gail Taylor NYTimes special e-commerce section on health care
00.10.23 Todd Johnston Jeff Johnston, et al. Important Metaphors Concept
00.10.23 Todd Johnston Jeff Johnston, et al. Re: Important Metaphors Concept
00.10.23 Lisa Piazza Todd Johnston, et al. Re: Important Metaphors Concept
00.10.21 Gail Taylor Jeff Johnston and Lisa Piazza lifelong kindergarden
00.10.19 Jeff Johnston Matt Taylor, et al. The Swiss House
00.10.19 Jeff Johnston Matt Taylor, et al. The Swiss House PDF
00.10.16 Jeff Johnston Ann Badillo and Gail Taylor dna.com
00.10.16 Jeff Johnston Russ White et al. Cogent network
00.10.13 Matt Taylor Jeff Johnston Floating Test Pad For High Tech
00.10.13 Matt Taylor Jeff Johnston and Russ White Avatars2000 Online Sunday, see you there?
00.10.12 Jeff Johnston Apollo Harden Underwater PC
00.10.09 Matt Taylor Jeff Johnston Humor: A Mind-body Connection
00.10.09 Todd Johnston Jeff Johnston et al. Site for Legal Information
00.10.04 Todd Johnston Matt Taylor et al. Re: FW: Top 100
00.10.04 Todd Johnston Jeff Johnston Top US bio-tech and life science regions
00.10.02 Jeff Johnston Gail Taylor et al. FW: First Monday October 2000
00.10.02 Mike Bednarek Matt Taylor et al. BT's patent on hyperlinking may get trumped by prior art
00.10.01 Jeff Johnston Matt Taylor et al. SAT out of the picture

 


From: Gail Taylor

Date: December 27, 2000

To: Matt Taylor, Jeff Johnston

Subject: Smart Office

http://www.smartoffice.com/

 

From: Poparad John T Contr

Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 16:47:07 +0000

To: 'Gail Taylor' , 'Patsy' , 'Matt Taylor' , 'Jeff Johnston'

Subject: Scenario material Possibly useful material for read aheads or a module reference

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/globaltrends2015/index.html

Scenario One: Inclusive Globalization: A virtuous circle develops among technology, economic growth, demographic factors, and effective governance, which enables a majority of the world's people to benefit from globalization. Technological development and diffusion-in some cases triggered by severe environmental or health crises-are utilized to grapple effectively with some problems of the developing world. Robust global economic growth-spurred by a strong policy consensus on economic liberalization-diffuses wealth widely and mitigates many demographic and resource problems. Governance is effective at both the national and international levels. In many countries, the state's role shrinks, as its functions are privatized or performed by public-private partnerships, while global cooperation intensifies on many issues through a variety of international arrangements. Conflict is minimal within and among states benefiting from globalization. A minority of the world's people-in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Central and South Asia, and the Andean region-do not benefit from these positive changes, and internal conflicts persist in and around those countries left behind.

Scenario Two: Pernicious Globalization Global elites thrive, but the majority of the world's population fails to benefit from globalization. Population growth and resource scarcities place heavy burdens on many developing countries, and migration becomes a major source of interstate tension. Technologies not only fail to address the problems of developing countries but also are exploited by negative and illicit networks and incorporated into destabilizing weapons. The global economy splits into three: growth continues in developed countries; many developing countries experience low or negative per capita growth, resulting in a growing gap with the developed world; and the illicit economy grows dramatically. Governance and political leadership are weak at both the national and international levels. Internal conflicts increase, fueled by frustrated expectations, inequities, and heightened communal tensions; WMD proliferate and are used in at least one internal conflict.

Scenario Three: Regional Competition Regional identities sharpen in Europe, Asia, and the Americas, driven by growing political resistance in Europe and East Asia to US global preponderance and US-driven globalization and each region's increasing preoccupation with its own economic and political priorities. There is an uneven diffusion of technologies, reflecting differing regional concepts of intellectual property and attitudes towards biotechnology. Regional economic integration in trade and finance increases, resulting in both fairly high levels of economic growth and rising regional competition. Both the state and institutions of regional governance thrive in major developed and emerging market countries, as governments recognize the need to resolve pressing regional problems and shift responsibilities from global to regional institutions. Given the preoccupation of the three major regions with their own concerns, countries outside these regions in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Central and South Asia have few places to turn for resources or political support. Military conflict among and within the three major regions does not materialize, but internal conflicts increase in and around other countries left behind.

Scenario Four: Post-Polar World US domestic preoccupation increases as the US economy slows, then stagnates. Economic and political tensions with Europe grow, the US-European alliance deteriorates as the United States withdraws its troops, and Europe turns inward, relying on its own regional institutions. At the same time, national governance crises create instability in Latin America, particularly in Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, and Panama, forcing the United States to concentrate on the region. Indonesia also faces internal crisis and risks disintegration, prompting China to provide the bulk of an ad hoc peacekeeping force. Otherwise, Asia is generally prosperous and stable, permitting the United States to focus elsewhere. Korea's normalization and de facto unification proceed, China and Japan provide the bulk of external financial support for Korean unification, and the United States begins withdrawing its troops from Korea and Japan. Over time, these geostrategic shifts ignite longstanding national rivalries among the Asian powers, triggering increased military preparations and hitherto dormant or covert WMD programs. Regional and global institutions prove irrelevant to the evolving conflict situation in Asia, as China issues an ultimatum to Japan to dismantle its nuclear program and Japan-invoking its bilateral treaty with the US-calls for US reengagement in Asia under adverse circumstances at the brink of a major war. Given the priorities of Asia, the Americas, and Europe, countries outside these regions are marginalized, with virtually no sources of political or financial support.

Generalizations Across the Scenarios: The four scenarios can be grouped in two pairs: the first pair contrasting the "positive" and "negative" effects of globalization; the second pair contrasting intensely competitive but not conflictual regionalism and the descent into regional military conflict. * In all but the first scenario, globalization does not create widespread global cooperation. Rather, in the second scenario, globalization's negative effects promote extensive dislocation and conflict, while in the third and fourth, they spur regionalism. * In all four scenarios, countries negatively affected by population growth, resource scarcities and bad governance, fail to benefit from globalization, are prone to internal conflicts, and risk state failure. * In all four scenarios, the effectiveness of national, regional, and international governance and at least moderate but steady economic growth are crucial. * In all four scenarios, US global influence wanes.

 

From: Todd Johnston

Date: December 19, 2000

To: Gail Taylor

Subject: "A Nonlinear Dynamics & Complexity Glossary"

http://www.vha.com/edgeplace/think/main_gloss.html

I came upon it while researching terms of art for our manual project. It's one to bookmark from a casual glance.

Todd

 

From: Jeff Johnston

Date: December 19, 2000

To: Matt Taylor et al.

Subject: Better Together

Did you hear the story on Morning Edition this morning about the Saguaro Seminar report on Community Building? The story itself wasn't all that interesting, but I did go to the "bettertogether" website (http://www.bettertogether.org/) and found some really good stuff.

Download the pdf of the report which was released today. (Note: print it big, the font is really small!)

The website has a "story collector:" "You can read stories about how people are connecting with each other and creating social capital. You can connect with other people who are interested in the same stories you are. You can also add your own story! "

This will be a great resource for us! Material here is relevant for a number of events that are currently in the works.

Jeff

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:38:16 -0800

To: Jeff Johnston

Subject: FW: How man apes animal medicine

-----Original Message-----

From: Stuart Silverstone [mailto:ss@graphics.org]

Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 11:56 PM

To: ideas@graphics.org

Subject: FWD: How man apes animal medicine

The way chimps and orang-utans use plants for medication is providing insights that could help their cousins. Aisling Irwin reports

SHE was a constipated chimpanzee called Chausiku, in the Mahale mountains of western Tanzania, and her behaviour seemed a little odd. Reaching for the shoot of a noxious tree that chimps would normally avoid, she peeled it and sucked its bitter pith. Within a day, the constipation - and other symptoms - were gone. Prof Michael Huffman of Kyoto University happened to be watching her that day. It was the first time a scientist had seen a sick chimp select an unsavoury plant known by humans to have medicinal properties, and then recover. Prof Huffman believes that he was glimpsing the evolutionary origins of human medicine. Understanding these beginnings could lead to new treatments. Since then, there have been several attempts to catch the great apes healing themselves and one of the latest is an elaborate project in Gunung Leuser National Park in Sumatra, Indonesia, home of the orang-utan. Scrambling up and down the rainforest ridges, as orang-utans swing deftly above her, is Dr Ivona Foitova, of the University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Science in Brno, Czech Republic. She notes the eating habits of our complex cousins and collects their dung for testing. Dr Foitova, with help from students at Gadjah Mada University in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, and volunteers from the charity Earthwatch, wants to gather hard evidence, rather than tall stories. There are anecdotes in abundance about "zoopharmacognosy", as animal self-healing is known. In Borneo, Dr Willie Smits, a tropical forest specialist at the Wanariset Samboja orang-utan rehabilitation centre near Balikpapan, says he once spotted an orangutan clutching its head. He had a headache, says Dr Smits. The creature plucked a flower from a certain plant and munched it. Shortly afterwards, it had perked up and gone on its way. Some time later, when Dr Smits had a headache in the rainforest, he tried the same remedy and says it worked. It is only a tale, and turning such things into rigorous studies is a laborious task. The scientist stumbling after the orang-utan must be able to spot ill health, recognise an unusual ingredient in the creature's variegated diet and witness the recovery afterwards. Against the odds, Prof Huffman and a host of other researchers have gradually discovered the details of a remarkable type of self-medication among chimpanzees in Tanzania. It was Jane Goodall, the veteran chimpanzee specialist, who first spotted chimps swallowing leaves in Gombe Stream National Park in the Sixties. The leaves - from any of 34 different trees - are swallowed singly, whole. They emerge in the dung intact and undigested, sporting neat, concertina-like folds. Leaf-swallowing peaks about two months after the rainy season has begun - about the same time as the peak of infection with the parasite Oe. stephanostomum. Prof Huffman has shown it tends to be only the sick among a group of chimps that will swallow leaves. These all have bristly undersides and, in the dung, live worms can be found caught among the hairs and folds of the defecated leaves. His "Velcro theory" of leaf-swallowing is that, as they pass through the intestine, they catch the worms and ferry them out of the body. Recently, in collaboration with Dr Judith Caton of the National University of Australia, he has also shown that the sick chimps tend to gorge on leaves in the morning on empty stomachs. They cannot digest the leaves and thus expel them rapidly in a great physical purging of worms. The few other known examples of self-medication are chemical rather than physical. At Bwindi Impenetrable Park and Mgahinga National Park in Uganda, mountain gorillas eat the bark of the nondescript dombeya tree as a food. The bark is laden with active ingredients, including antibiotics that kill common bacteria such as E. Coli, and there is anecdotal evidence that the presence of various bugs in the dung matches the dombeya-eating patterns of the gorilla. C hausiku, the bitter pith-sucking chimp, seems to be a true pharmacist, though, seeking out an unpleasant substance with no nutritive value in response to stomach pains. The pith, from the tree Vernonia amygdalina, has now been scrutinised in laboratories and given up its secrets. It contains compounds active against many of the parasites responsible for malaria, dysentery and schistosomiasis. The local people, the WaTongwe, use the same plant to treat the same illnesses - and they recover in the same time period. It seems the scientists have indeed been poking around in the origins of the human healing arts. Plants contain toxins designed to deter predators. It is no surprise, therefore, that animals inadvertently eat low levels of poison in their diet and that these get to work killing the infections within. Added to this is the deliberate selection of bitter substances to which animals would usually have an instinctive aversion. This must be a learnt behaviour, says Prof Huffman. The great apes have a huge capacity for social learning. He has seen a young chimp watch its sick mother take medicine, which it has then tasted itself. For the many researchers who believe chimps are capable of empathy, it is easy to conclude that they can learn from their peers the symptoms, the medicine and the dosage. "Chimpanzees tend to be very conservative in their feeding habits," says Prof Huffman. "As part of growing up, they have to learn what and how to eat by watching the behaviour of their elders. In this way, knowledge and experience of the group is passed down in the form of behavioural tradition and the danger of individual experimentation with poisonous plants is limited to a few." We have marched a long way from great ape forest remedies to modern medicine, with its purified, single-action drugs, and Prof Huffman is trying to show how the philosophy of medicine has changed along the way. As a result of this change, he believes, we have lost an important principle that breathed potency into the first medicine cabinets. First, we have separated medicine and food into different categories. We have then divided food into graspable concepts such as protein, carbohydrate and vitamins. This categorisation - and the eating habits that result - ignores the abundant network of plant toxins whose consumption should provide us with our first defence against disease. Second, we no longer exploit the mechanisms by which these plant toxins tackle disease. Forest remedies rarely expunge the disease; they just suppress it. The leaf-swallowing chimps still carry parasites, but in low, safe numbers. At the end of the rainy season, infections disappear naturally. Modern medicine's success stems from the opposite approach: "We are using drugs that are one single compound, that have one mechanism of action," says Prof Huffman. The disadvantage of this is drug resistance, which happens because the "single mechanism" approach stimulates the parasite to form a counter-strategy. "Bitter pith probably contains 20 or more different compounds with different levels of activity, different effects on the parasite. Some of the most bioactive compounds act to paralyse the worm, inhibit movement, prevent egg laying. Other compounds are toxic." Suppressing disease through a multi-pronged attack that thwarts the development of resistance among parasites could be a useful route to new medicines for humans and livestock, researchers believe. In Sumatra more concrete examples of possible new therapeutic approaches may emerge. It is the first time anyone has properly examined orang-utan self-therapists. Dr Foitova is collecting samples of everything that goes into the orang-utan mouth - from unripe fruit to soil, honey and insects - and everything that comes out of the other end. The orang-utans are followed from dawn to dusk. But time is running out. We may never know more than a fraction of what lies in the great apes' pharmacies. Their forests in Africa, Indonesia and Malaysia are falling swiftly to loggers. Scientists give them only 10 more years in the wild. In Sumatra, the orangutan sub-species studied by Dr Foitova was recently listed as critically endangered. The mysteries of wild great ape remedies may become permanently locked in the past.

 

From: Poparad John T Contr AEDC/SVT

Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:21:00 +0000

To: 'Gail Taylor' , 'Jeff Johnston' , 'Matt Taylor' , Graham Ralph E Civ AEDC/XPX

Subject: Fooled Again

New Scientist, 9 December 2000

It all started with the article "Fooled Again" and led to a 12 alarm headache. So I figured, why should I be the only one with a head ache? Thinking About Thought Piero Scaruffi Cognition: A General Property of Matter (Craik, Simon, Newell, Johnson-Laird, Fauconnier, Lakoff, Marr, Paivio, Kosslyn, Pylyshyn, Finke, Tye, Selz, Minsky, Schank, Arbib, Leyton, Sowa) Cognition

Cognition is the set of faculties that allow the mind to process inputs from the external world and to determine action in the external world. They comprise perception, learning, memory, reasoning and so forth. Basically, we perceive something, we store it in memory, we retrieve related information, we process the whole, we learn something, we store it in memory, we use it to decide what to do next. All of these are part of cognition. Is all of cognition conscious? Is there something that we remember, learn or process without being aware of it? Probably. At least, the level of awareness may vary wildly. Sometimes we study a poem until we can remember all the words in the exact order: that requires a lot of awareness. Sometimes we simply store an accident without paying too much attention to it. Consciousness is like another dimension. One can be engaged in this or that cognitive task (first dimension) and then it can be aware of it with different levels of intensity (second dimension). It is, therefore, likely that cognitive faculties and consciousness are independent processes. Since it processes inputs and yields outputs, cognition has the invaluable advantage that it lends itself to modeling and testing endeavours, in a more scientific fashion than studies on consciousness.

Language too is a cognitive process....

(Go to the New Scientist website, or e-mail Jeff for the complete article.)

 

From: Russ White

Date: December 18, 2000

To: Knowledge Base

Subject: Experience Economy pdf

This article is from HBR. I thought it should have a home in the kbase.

experience_economy.pdf

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:34:41 -0800

To: Lisa Piazza , Todd.Johnston@mgtaylor.com, Jeff Johnston , Patsy Kahoe , RK Bruce, DavidC1016@aol.com

Subject: RE: Institutional Trust

This is the great opportunity. A ValueWeb (r) system is a deliberate self-aware enterprise that is made up of all the components of a replacement economy (Jacobs). Within this system, new rules of engagement can be employed. Because of this, the burden imposed by this fragmented culture can be mitigated. I have always said that we are inventing a social system. We are reaching convergence with the opportunity. We have to not get bogged down by the society of which we are a part that we are trying to help replace.

Matt

 

From: Lisa Piazza

Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:51:21 -0500

To: Todd Johnston, Jeff Johnston , Patsy Kahoe , RK Bruce , DavidC1016@aol.com, Matt Taylor

Subject: Institutional Trust, The Great Disruption ...

Human Nature and the Reconsitution of Social Order - Francis Fukuyama, June 1999

Worthwhile reading in general ... but particulary interesting these days ...

"Trust is a key by-product of the cooperative social norms that constitute social capital. If people can be counted on to keep commitments, honor norms of reciprocity, and avoid opportunistic behavior, then groups will form more readily, and those that do form will be able to achieve common purposes more efficiently. If trust is a significant measure of social capital, then there are clear signs that the latter has been in decline. Many Americans are aware that trust in institutions of all sorts, beginning with the U.S. government, has been steadily declining over time and reached historic lows during the 1990's. In 1958, 73% if Americans surveyed said they trusted the federal government to do with is right, either "most of the time" or "just about always." By 1994, this figure had fallen as low as 15 percent (depending on the poll), though by 1996-1997 confidence had increased again so that it averaged somewhere in the mid- to upper 20s. Correspondingly, those trusting the government either "none of the time" or only "some of the time" rose from 23 percent in 1958 to a range of 71 to 85% in 1995 (again, declining slightly in subsequent years). Most American institutions have fared only slightly better. Corporations, organized labor, banks, the medical profession, organized religion, the military, education, television, and the press all saw declined in the percentages of those expressing trust in them between the early 1970s and the early 1990s. Within the government, only the Supreme Court has more Americans feeling a "great deal" of confidence rather than "hardly any," a situation that is reversed for the executive branch and is even worse for Congress. Only the scientific community had enjoyed a relatively constant level of confidence."

 

From: Lisa Piazza

Date: December 11, 2000

To: Jeff Johnston

Subject: Knowledge Worker Fodder

12/18/00 issue of Fortune

Need Innovation: Start Locking Up the Tech Toys

http://library.northernlight.com/MG20001218010000099.html?cb=13&sc=0#doc

Need Innovation? Start by Locking Up the Tech Toys

Technology makes it seductively easy to generate more and more so-called information in less and less time.

Michael Schrage

Technology? Just say no. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Henry Shelton reportedly forbids Microsoft PowerPoint-based slide presentations by his executive officers. So does Sun Microsystems CEO Scott McNealy. It's not that they hate Microsoft--well, maybe Shelton doesn't--but that they believe the organizational benefits of these digital slide shows are outweighed by their costs.

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:52:36 -0800

To: Bill Blackburn , David Calverley , Robert Darling , Pat Gibson

Cc: Jeff Johnston , Todd Johnston , Patsy Kahoe , Lisa Piazza , Russ White

All... An example of a web site that introduces a cutting edge product, tells why, tells a story, and does it in a bold and delightful way. Unfortunately, this is Euro-Centric so you will not be able to get into all of the site. I understand, that once registered, Europeans can configure and order their own SMART automobile online.

http://www.smart.com

Notice the entire package: great product, a point of view, brand image, URL name. This is an integrated concept. Notice how the central theme of the product is reinforced again and again. The problems that the designer of this site faced are very similar to the ones that we have to confront. I believe they were solved brilliantly. A strong message delivered without offense. The newness of the product turned into an asset. The essence of the product expressed DIRECTLY by the site execution. It can be argued, of course, that this is an expensive and technically sophisticated site - no question about it. However, there are many where more was spent for far lesser a result. it is the understanding and design that counts - no matter how simple or elaborate the result. Design is just coming to the web. We are a design company - all business units are. We must lead in this phase of we evolution. It is our great opportunity to level the playing field.

Matt

 

From: Jeff Johnston

Date: December 8, 2000

To: Gail Taylor et al.

Subject: cool mapping sites

Found a couple cool sites related to mapping ...

http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~feegi/index.html

http://www.aquarius.geomar.de/omc/omc_intro.html

 

From: Lisa Piazza

Date: December 8, 2000

To: Knowledge Base

Subject: http://www.cio.com/forums/healthcare/

Jeff - I find CIO magazine a well organized resource ... here's their healthcare space Ê Ê

http://www.cio.com/forums/healthcare/

 

From: "Lisa Piazza"

Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:27:06 -0500

To: Knowledge Base

Subject: Healthcare ... Chaos article

Life at the Edge of Chaos Curt Lindberg, Alfred Herzog, MD, Martin Merry, MD, Jeffrey Goldstein, PhD

http://www.nhgmaine.com/Articles/life_at_the_edge_of_chaos.htm

 

From: Lisa Piazza

Date: December 7, 2000

To: Knowledge Base

Subject: First Round Healthcare links

Jeff -Ê I'll get into my paper archives for healthcare... maybe I can talk John into beingÊa pack mule... but here are a few quick hits off the top of my head: Ê

Red Herring has a whole huge issue (37 page) on "Healthcare and the Net" a couple of months ago.

"HEALTH CARE AND THE NET , paper-choked industry may badly need the Internet, but e-health companies face enormous challenges"

HEALTH CARE AND THE NET The Internet will transform the industry eventually, but it's a tough one to wring a profit from.

CHRONIC AILMENTS The hard economics of health care make a difficult backdrop for IT vendors.

COMBINATION SHOT Healtheon/WebMD now faces two challenges: integrating acquisitions -- and making money.

DOCTOR NO Physicians hold the key to the e-health market -- but they remain unconvinced.

HIPAA TENSION The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act makes Y2K compliance look easy.

RESTRICTED MOBILITY Europe's e-health startups face unique obstacles.

BROKEN RECORDS Don't hold your breath for electronic medical records.

HYPOCRITIC OATHS Personal information may not be private on consumer medical sites. Ê

HBR had a Clayton Christensen article on the Innovator's Dilemma and Healthcare: Ê Will Disruptive Innovations Cure Health Care? Ê Ê

Health Forum Journal is my favorite healthcare publication (partly because of graphics, which you don't get in the web version ... nonetheless, it has a good search engine. Ê Type in the word "innovation" and you get these titles: Ê The problem with innovation Saturday, July 01, 2000 - Health Forum Journal The Next Wave of Innovation Monday, November 01, 1999 - Health Forum Journal An Innovation Rx Saturday, May 01, 1999 - Health Forum Journal Leadership and White Space: The Struggle for Strategy Innovation in Health care Saturday, May 01, 1999 - Health Forum Journal

Here's a few "classics" that we've used: Complexity Science: A Route Through Hard Times and Uncertainty Ê Gone Chordic: Dee Hock, the mastermind behind Visa, has some ideas about reorganizing health care. Ê Knowledge Management: Moving the Care Model from a Snapshot to a Story Ê This is the Voluntary Hospital Association, who had a complexity program for a couple of years. I attended one of their confereces: Complexity Resources for Healthcare professionals http://www.vha.com/edgeplace/index.html Ê

This was in the World Future Society's "The Futurist" last summer - I'll send you the hardcopy. It doesn't seem to be available online. Health Care in 2025: A Patient's Encounter By James O. Wooten Health kiosks at the mall will handle patients' needs for medical tests, cancer screening, diagnosis, and referrals for specialty care.ÊFrom the Futurist Magazine, July/Aug 2000ÊÊ Ê

Here's two I stumbled across but have not used: Annotated Scenario Bibliography - has some in healthcare ... may be useful in your archives in general

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/4787/millennium/demogrscen.html

California Healthcare Association

http://www.cha-cahhs.org/res_links.htm

Lisa Piazza

 

From: Jeff Johnston

Date: December 6, 2000

To: Matt Taylor et al.

Subject: Micro Cosmos

For some beautiful images of "natural" nanotechnology, check out:

http://www.nikonusa.com/gallery/smallworld/99smallworld.html

Jeff

 

From: Poparad John T Contr AEDC/SVT

Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 16:29:32 +0000

To: 'Gail Taylor' , 'Jeff Johnston' , 'Matt Taylor' , 'Patsy'

Subject: SFI Bulletin

http://www.santafe.edu/sfi/publications/Bulletins/bulletinFall00/index.html

You got to read Volume 15 Number 2 as soon as it's posted. I have a hard copy and started highlighting only to discover I was painting the whole thing yellow. This one is a fun edition on Robustness in addition to the usual good stuff.

 

From: Poparad John T Contr AEDC/SVT

Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 20:44:50 +0000

To: 'Gail Taylor' , 'Jeff Johnston' , 'Matt Taylor' , 'Patsy'

Subject: BUILDING A BEEHIVE

Fascinating that the U S Navy should be printing articles like this. Met a guy from the War College last time I was at the Santa Fe Institute who also talked the language.

BUILDING A BEEHIVE - OBSERVATIONS ON THE TRANSITION TO NETWORK-CENTRIC OPERATIONS, Captain George Kasten, U.S. Navy, Naval War College Review, Autum 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 4

Conceptual changes always provoke institutional resistance. Some see network-centric operations (NCOs) as a high-speed train that will ultimately determine the size and shape of future naval forces. Others think NCO could derail important programs that they believe in. There are also concerns that monumental resource allocations could be pinned to such a new and undeveloped concept. This debate occurs at a time when there is already fierce interservice and intraservice competition over the relevance and prioritization of existing and programmed platforms. There are big bets to be placed. Is NCO the right horse? The short answer is yes. Of course, there is much uncertainty. NCO will be the product of many interacting forces. The resulting complexity will make its final form as unpredictable as long-range weather. NCO will both shape and be shaped by the character of future warfare and the development of our strategic culture, as well as by the reactions of potential adversaries to our developing style of fighting. That is why NCO should be allowed to evolve without the constraints of a precise script that would enslave it to inevitable errors in the details. The information age has set off an avalanche of fundamental change throughout society. The best-studied effects are still unfolding in the transformation of the economy. For decades, people have been thrilled, made apprehensive, enchanted, or unsettled, but always dazzled, by the pace of technological change. Below the surface, however, lost in the commotion of new discoveries and gadgets, something much more significant has been emerging-a new economic order.1 Because of networking, the basic rules of economic behavior have been turned inside out. New laws of increasing returns describe effects that either had not occurred previously or were masked by incorrect industrial-age assumptions. During the Industrial Age, economics, warfare, and other human behaviors were radically transformed. The current transformation promises to be equally momentous.

(Contact Jeff if you're interested in the rest of the article.)

 

From: Poparad John T Contr AEDC/SVT

Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:55:44 +0000

To: 'Jeff Johnston' , 'Gail Taylor' , 'Patsy' , 'Matt Taylor'

Subject: In the Zero Luck Zone There's some interesting work being done under the title's of agile organizations and adaptive organizations.

In the Zero Luck Zone , by Robert Pool

MOST COMPANIES DON'T WORRY too much about luck. If their luck is good, so much the better; if it's bad, they hope it's not too bad. Either way, they figure there is not too much they can do about it. Some organizations, though, cannot afford to be so nonchalant. These organizations manage complex, high-risk technologies that must be kept within a narrow operating range. For them, a bit of bad luck threatens far more than a dip in the quarterly profits. Operations may be disrupted and major equipment destroyed, and people, perhaps many people, may die. These organizations have responded by finding ways to remove luck almost completely from their environment, controlling events to a degree that seems impossible to anyone familiar with the normal, messy world of business. Just how they do it is an intriguing tale and one that holds lessons for anyone, particularly those in high tech, who must deal with the unexpected.

See the November 27, 2000 Forbes ASAP for the complete article.

 

From: Lisa Piazza

Reply-To: Lisa Piazza

Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:38:35 -0500

To: Bill Blackburn , egibson@proximal.com, Matt Taylor , DavidC1016@aol.com, Jeff Johnston , Russ White , Gail Taylor

Subject: Stanford Interactive Workspaces Project

I suggest taking a look at this: Stanford Interactive Workspaces Project

http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/iwork/

 

From: Ann Badillo

Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:41:23 -0800

To: Gail Taylor et al.

Subject: EarthLights--Very cool

Friends,

Check this out---It reframes one's perspective.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg

Peace,

Ann

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 05:11:03 -0800

To: Jeff Johnston

Subject: FW: Christopher Alexander speaking in SF

You may want to go to this. I understand that Alexander is filing a patent on this.

Sequence, of course is one of the basic insights of the DesignShop (r) process.

Matt

-----Original Message-----

From: Stuart Silverstone [mailto:ss@graphics.org]

Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 12:51 AM

To: sf@graphics.org

Subject: FWD: Christopher Alexander speaking in SF

[if anyone in the bay area can cover this event with overview notes, audio recording and/or video recording the results would be much appreciated here]

Computer Systems Laboratory Colloquium 4:15PM, Wednesday, November 29, 2000 NEC Auditorium, Gates Computer Science Building B03

Title: The missing link in software pattern theory. Generative sequences as the next breakthrough in programming.

Speaker: Christopher Alexander Patternlanguage.com

About the talk: Professor Alexander will address the road he has followed in the last years that have taken him from patterns to sequences. A generative sequences is a semi-algorithm, a flexible system of instructions which lay out for the user which decisions need to be made in which order. Decision A becomes the context for Decision B and when the sequence is a good one, the morphology of the resulting design unfolds naturally, reaching a coherent though highly complex and subtle structure. No backtracking is necessary. In mainstream architectural practices, there are requirements for plans and blueprints which force premature decisions which then become contractually binding and costly to correct. Generative sequences allow for a more organic unfolding, much as an embryo unfolds, each stage preserving essential characteristics of the previous stage, and each stage having "wholeness" in and of itself. The discussion will also address the issue of protected programs or sequences and open/shared programs and the ethics of websites such as c2.com. If you are planning to attend the session, you may wish to take a look at the website http://www.patternlanguage.com. In particular, there is a demo and worked example of a short sequence which takes you through the decision steps in designing an entrance transition. For the enthusiastic (or sleepless) you can spend hours on the material posted--and all feedback is welcome.

About the speaker: Following a dual career as a professor at the Univeristy of California, Berkeley and as a practicing architect, Christopher Alexander is now taking his ideas and activities "on-line" through a new website patternlanguage.com. He is most well known among computer scientists for the book A Pattern Language published in the late 70's. His new work The Nature of Order is now at the printer and will soon be available.

 

From: Jeff Johnston

Date: November 26, 2000

To: Matt Taylor et al.

Subject: Jane Jacobs on cnn.com

check out:

http://www.cnn.com/2000/books/news/11/23/jane.jacobs.ap/index.html

for an article on Jane Jacobs.

Jeff

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:17:29 -0800

To: Jeff Johnston

Subject: FW: Gutenberg Bible headed for Internet

FYI...

Matt

-----Original Message-----

From: Stuart Silverstone [mailto:ss@graphics.org]

Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 12:33 AM

To: ideas@graphics.org

Subject: FWD: Gutenberg Bible headed for Internet

Wednesday, 22 November 2000 12:05 (ET)

GUTENBERG BIBLE HEADED FOR INTERNET LONDON, Nov. 22 (UPI) -- The 15th century Gutenberg Bible, the first major book to be printed in the West, is about to travel the world on the 21st century information superhighway. The British Library and Japan's Keio University teamed up to put two of the Bibles on the Internet at the library's Web site, www.bl.uk, to give scholars around the globe access without damaging the originals. The British Library has two copies and a fragment of a third of the 180 Bibles Gutenberg printed. "The books are actually quite strong," said Kristian Jensen, the library's curator of early printed books, "but the one thing that can destroy them is being handled too much." "If we can give access to them while preventing that," Jensen added, "it will ensure they will be with us 500 years from now." Using technology originally designed for spy satellites, 10 researchers and technical experts from Keio University and Japan's NTT telecommunications company spent two weeks at the library digitalizing the pages. Jensen said, that if anyone wants to examine the originals, "a lot of the images are of such good quality that you would be better off looking at them on the Internet." "We've been able to magnify them to such an extent that you can see details that it's very difficult to see with the naked eye," he said. Experts are worried about preserving the Gutenberg Bibles. Of the 180 copies printed using Johannes Gutenberg's revolutionary movable type system, only "significant parts" of 43 remain. The British Library has one copy printed on paper and one on vellum. Jensen said putting both online would make it easier to compare the two. But if experts still want to view the originals, the curator added, they may still apply for permission.

http://www.vny.com/cf/news/upidetail.cfm?QID=138174

Copyright 2000 by United Press International

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:17:34 -0800

To: Russ White , Jeff Johnston

Subject: FW: Home servers: The new data butlers

Peer to peer...

Matt

-----Original Message-----

From: Stuart Silverstone [mailto:ss@graphics.org]

Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 9:55 AM

To: ideas@graphics.org

Subject: FWD: Home servers: The new data butlers

"Home servers: The new data butlers" By John G. Spooner, ZDNet News November 23, 2000 12:54 PM PT

"The next computing revolution may begin at home. PC makers are working to create a new home-computing experience that links networked appliances to server-like PCs with enough bandwidth and storage to deliver messages, music, and movies to every room in the house."

http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0%2C4586%2C2657265%2C00.html

 

From: Todd Johnston

Date: November 23, 2000

To: Matt Taylor , Jeff Johnston , , Russ White , Gail Taylor , Lisa Piazza , Mike Bednarek

Subject: Europe Nixes Software Patents

fyi...

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,40329,00.html?tw=wn20001122

Todd

 

From: Gail Taylor

Date: November 18, 2000

To: Lisa Piazza, Todd Johnston , Jeff johnston

Subject: useful website

This one is the right link.

http://www.lucifer.com/~sasha/thinkers.html

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: November 10, 2000

To: Bob Taylor et al.

Subject: Software Engineers

All...

This is an interesting piece - Chris Allen sent it. It speaks a great deal to several things we are about - as a community - and in our own singular work. A great deal of information regarding how we should be shaping our message regarding the work environment. I believe that

http://www.matttaylor.com/public/pod.htm

does answer a number of the issues that were raised. There is much more, however, to be addressed.

Matt

http://www.arsdigita.com/asj/managing-software-engineers/

 

From Jeff Johnston

Date: November 9, 2000

To: Matt Taylor , Mike Bednarek , Lisa Piazza , Todd Johnston , Gail Taylor , Russ White

Subject: Bounty Quest

This is an interesting response to the current IP mess ...

http://www.bountyquest.com/

Get paid for locating prior art to help companies knock down competing patents.  


From Science, 27 October, 2000.

NET NEWS: Win Cash for Patent Busting


Fact-hoarding scientists and engineers, take note: Now there's a potential way to cash in on your headfuls of arcane knowledge. A new Web site hopes to "strengthen the patent system" by offering a bounty to anyone who can provide obscure documents to support or shoot down high-stakes patents.

The U.S. Patent Office (USPTO) has come under fire in recent years for granting patents too readily, especially for software and biotechnology. One reason is that patent examiners don't have time to go beyond online databases in their search for evidence that an invention isn't original. This new site, BountyQuest), is aimed mainly at helping companies knock down competing patents by locating this "prior art"--such as journal articles in foreign languages or technical manuals. For example, you can win $10,000 for rustling up a document "describing a purified preparation of primate embryonic stem cells" from before 1994. Cash is also available for information that undermines Amazon.com's one-click purchasing patent or a gasoline additive.

The idea is "interesting," says Internet Patent News Service editor Greg Aharonian, but he argues that it would cost companies less to hire veteran patent consultants to find the same documents. Besides, Aharonian believes that the real problem is the glut of bad patents issued by the USPTO. BountyQuest, he says, is "treating the symptoms, not the disease."



From: Jeff Johnston

Date: November 8, 2000

To: Matt Taylor

CC: Todd Johnston , Lisa Piazza , Gail Taylor , Bill Blackburn

Subject: Community Design

Matt,

check out:

http://www.designcorps.org/designcorps.html

I think you'll find resonance.

Jeff

 

From: Jeff Johnston

Date: Friday, October 27, 2000.

To: John Joseph

CC: Lisa Piazza , Matt Taylor , Lori Bergeron , K Base

Subject: FW: 10/27/2000 Daily Report from The Chronicle of Higher Education

Hi John,

It was probably apparent from the K-Base I collected from the TOEFL DS event that the Chronicle of Higher Education was a useful source of information. I purchased a 6 months subscription (<$50) so that I could fully utilize their site in my ETS work a couple weeks ago, you may want to think about doing the same to support the ongoing relationship.

http://chronicle.com/

The Chronicle offers a daily or weekly e-mail to inform about current stories. You may want to subscribe to this as well.

Jeff

 

From: Jeff Johnston

Date: October 25, 2000

To: Ann Badillo, Gail Taylor

Subject: NYTimes special e-commerce section on health care

Check out:

http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/10/biztech/technology/

for what look to be a number of interesting, relevant articles.

Jeff

 

From: Todd Johnston

Date: October 23, 2000

To: Jeff Johnston, Gail Taylor, Lisa Piazza

Subject: Important Metaphors Concept

Ecotone: the transition zone between two ecological communities, usually a belt rather than an abrupt line. It has some of the ecological features of both communities, but has its own distinct ecological structure.

I came across the term in a NY Times article (on 'design') and looked it up on the web. It is the subject (or a subject) of many academic papers and I saw it used in a number of context besides the purely ecological sense. It would seem a useful concept to use in modeling how (value) webs and structures and organization overlaps - and that overlap creates an entity that in some regards, is different from either (or any) of the overlapping systems.

Todd

From: Todd Johnston

Date: October 23, 2000

To: Jeff Johnston, Gail Taylor, Lisa Piazza

Subject: Re: Important Metaphors Concept

This is a useful page for a definition and launching into related concepts, such as the 'edge effect' which is the effect caused on a ecosystem by a neighboring ecosystem.

http://www.britannica.com/seo/e/ecotone/

Todd Johnston wrote:

> Ecotone: the transition zone between two ecological communities, usually a belt rather than an abrupt line. It has some of the ecological features of both >communities, but has its own distinct ecological structure. I came across the term in a NY Times article (on 'design') and looked it up on the web. It is the >subject (or a subject) of many academic papers and I saw it used in a number of context besides the purely ecological sense. It would seem a useful concept >to use in modeling how (value) webs and structures and organization overlaps - and that overlap creates an entity that in some regards, is different from >either (or any) of the overlapping systems.

>Todd

From: Lisa Piazza

Date: October 23, 2000

To:Todd Johnston, Gail Taylor, Jeff Johnston

Subject: Re: Important Metaphors Concept

Todd, nice!

My immediate insight was to pull in the notion of ecotone, into some work I've been doing with putting transition management inside of the entrepreneurial button of stages of an enterprise.

The button is laid down flat to become a landscape. There are three zones/worlds, not just two.

One zone, has familiar fitness peaks for old ways of working (that can certainly still be worthwhile to climb, but of course not necessairly ... in our client's mind it's easy to plant the notion that traditional process improvement methods can be applied to these peaks. These are in the zone of stability, linear, sequential processes, rules, where action and consequenses are close to one another.

Then there's a middle zone where fitness peaks are a bit more rugged ... where the other shoe of transition management falls. This is the landscape of non-linearity/complexity ... where emergence, creativity, knowledge creation, innovation, group genius rule the day.

There's a third zone ... where really rugged peaks lie, the home of chaos, a tendancy towards avoidance ... and yet the best place to find weak signals, faint patterns of possibility.

Anyway, that a rough and quick description. Nonetheless, the notion of te ecotones between to ecological communities ... is useful in this transition management model. Thanks.

 

From: Gail Taylor

Date: October 21, 2000

To: Jeff Johnston, Lisa Piazza

Subject: lifelong kindergarden

http://el.www.media.mit.edu/groups/el/papers/mres/lifelongk/index.html

also visit:

http://www.playfulworld.com

The book is wonderful! useful stuff for upcoming ETA

 

From Jeff Johnston

Date: October 19, 2000

To: Matt Taylor , Lisa Piazza , Gail Taylor , Todd Johnston , Bill Blackburn , Mike Bednarek

Subject: The Swiss House

Just came across this project.

http://www.creativeswitzerland.com/index.htm

Something to visit next time you're in Cambridge.

Jeff

From the website:

The Mission

The Swiss House for Advanced Research and Education is the world's first digital consulate and serves as a link between the scientific, academic, and high-tech communities of New England and Switzerland. SHARE is a community that is both physical and virtual. It serves as a face-to-face meeting point for creative thinkers and entrepreneurs from both countries. The interactive Web site with video cameras in the Swiss House will allow people to tune into what is going on. The extensive network of the Swiss House allows easy access to Switzerland for any US-company, institution or researcher seeking closer links with Swiss know-how.

What We Offer

Our extensive networks in both countries enable us to make the right connection between two persons in order to establish mutually beneficial relationships. The information available at the Swiss House - in research, education, business and culture - serves visitors as a one stop shop for the new economy. Swiss House meeting and working space is offered to visitors for a limited period of time with advance notice.

From Jeff Johnston

Date: October 19, 2000

To: Matt Taylor , Lisa Piazza , Gail Taylor , Todd Johnston , Bill Blackburn , Mike Bednarek

Subject: The Swiss House PDF

Attached is a pdf file from the Swiss House webpage (www.creativeswitzerland.com), in case you missed it.

This is worth looking at in detail as there appears to be direct relevance/overlap to material in the iterations patent.

Jeff

click here for the PDF.

 

From: Jeff Johnston

Date: October 16, 2000

To: Ann Badillo and Gail Taylor

Subject: dna.com

Hi Ann,

I saw this in the October 6 issue of Science.  

Jeff

NET NEWS: DNA Donation Site Draws a Crowd

You can already use the Internet to shop and make airline reservations; now= you can donate your DNA, too. A commercial Web site (http;//www.dna.com) is soliciting volunteers to submit blood for gene= tic disease research.

You won't receive any obvious benefit, such as your genetic profile in the mail, if you send your DNA to the company, DNA Sciences of Mountain View, California. But its Gene Trust project promises the "excitement and satisfaction" of knowing that "you played a part in medical history. The company plans to make money by developing diagnostic tests and by licensing its discoveries to drug companies.

To participate, you simply answer a few questions--age, ethnicity, whether you or members of your immediate family have one of 21 diseases--and click a button agreeing to a consent form. DNA Sciences may then contact you to ask more questions and arrange for you to give blood.

The strategy is working: Last month, just 6 weeks after the site opened, the company announced that it had attracted 4500 volunteers, enough to start studies of colon cancer, breast cancer, and asthma. (Over 400 have actually given blood.) Its ultimate goal is 100,000 samples. Scientific director Ray White, formerly at the University of Utah, says he's especially excited about the Internet's potential for building "ongoing relationships" that follow a subject's health over many years.

To Stanford University law professor Henry Greely, the voluntary project is better in some ways than, say, Iceland's controversial national DNA data banks (Science, 30 October 1998, p. 859). But he
questions whether informed consent obtained via the Web is adequate and whether people realize that their DNA could hypothetically be used for any purpose, such as studying genes for sexual orientation.

 

From: Jeffrey Johnston

Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:53:56 -0800

To: Russ White

Cc: Matt Taylor , Apollo Harden

Subject: Cogent network

Russ ... Are you familiar with these guys?

(from the San Jose Mercury News yesterday)

Cogent builds data-only network fiber-optics may transform internet BY LESLIE WALKER Washington Post WASHINGTON --

Dave Schaeffer's seventh start-up is a doozy, much bigger -- and far riskier -- than the taxicab radio spectrum he rolled up and sold to Nextel Communications, or the wholesale wireless access business he built at Pathnet Inc. From his office in Georgetown, he is poised to light his own fiber-optic Internet backbone next month and start selling Internet access to tenants inside large office buildings in major cities at 70 times the speed and two-thirds the price telephone companies typically charge. Schaeffer's Cogent Communications has committed to spending more than half a billion dollars to test his belief that a national network built to carry only data -- no voice or phone calls -- can make money delivering an ultra-high-powered Internet to businesses. Cogent is among a new breed of telecommunication carriers racing to exploit fiber-optic advances and deliver on the promise of the Internet -- instant communication with everyone everywhere -- that remains stubbornly beyond the reach of the average business and consumer. The Internet for the most part is still a rocky back road because its architects can't agree on how to build the wider highways needed to handle the recent explosion of data traffic. ``The Internet is the most gluttonous consumer of communications resources known to man,'' said Carl Russo, who runs fiber optics for Cisco Systems and pioneered the switching box that Cogent is installing in office buildings. ``Cogent is offering a cafeteria to the gluttonous. They represent the future of what is going to happen in the Bell telephone space.'' Cogent's $1,000-a-month, virtually all-you-can-use Internet offer is puzzling to competitors and potential customers, who wonder how the price of Internet access could plunge so deeply. Each Cogent customer will get unshared access at 100 million bits of code per second, a leap up from the 1.5 million bits per second that corporate ``T1'' lines typically provide for $1,500 a month. Those T1 lines use phone-company copper wires originally designed to carry voice. How Cogent can make such an offer provides an intriguing glimpse into the fiber-optics revolution, which is cutting the cost of high-speed data connections and spawning carriers with names like Cogent, Telseon, CoreExpress and Yipes. Win or lose, these gambles show the challenges telephone companies increasingly face from new business models based on breakthroughs in how light is beamed through glass fibers. ``Fiber is doubling its capacity to carry data every 10 months,'' said Schaeffer, the 44-year-old scion of a District of Columbia taxicab empire. ``It's up 16,000-fold from the beginning of the last decade. Today we are at less than half a percent of the theoretical capacity of a fiber.'' Advances in the number and power of glass fibers being laid underground allowed Cogent to develop an optical network more cheaply than similar networks of the past. Cogent purchased two fiber strands running cross-country inside cables laid by Williams Communication, plus another single strand in various cities from Metromedia Fiber Networks. Cogent is exploiting another engineering breakthrough, too, one that has allowed the humble corporate network -- known as a local area network, or Ethernet -- to reach the transmission speeds of fiber optics. In effect, engineers devised a way to plug local area networks directly into the Internet. Glass fiber, of course, is hardly new in telecommunications. Fiber has carried voice and data underground across the country for two decades. But until recently, it was too expensive to reach all but the largest corporations. In the 1990s, the carrying capacity of fiber was greatly magnified by prism-like devices that split light beams into colors so each could carry data as a separate channel. The economic repercussions are shaking the telecommunications industry, which is in a tizzy over what kind of networking gear should carry the next generation of Internet, telephone and television signals. Why traffic slows The Internet's biggest problem is that it still rides atop a hybrid architecture that uses both glass fibers and copper wires designed for voice. This slows traffic because data packets travel as light through fiber, then are converted into electrons to move over copper wires. The bottlenecks are the worst in cities, which have little fiber. Converting to an all-fiber network could take decades because the Internet has not one but many backbones, sprawling networks that are owned for the most part by phone companies -- WorldCom, Sprint and AT&T. All have a vested interest in maintaining revenue from their copper phone networks. Change is nonetheless coming fast. As entrepreneurs lay fiber under city streets, other companies are leasing their glass strands and running them inside buildings so they can sell Internet access at rates that underprice phone companies. The new offerings are many orders of magnitude faster than cable TV lines or digital subscriber phone lines (DSL). Customers include an assortment of medium and small businesses, schools, hospitals and other institutions. Some have only the dimmest idea how they might use the extra capacity. Jim Linn, information technology director for the American Gas Association on Capitol Hill, was incredulous when Cogent cold-called a few months ago. ``The first thing I thought is, this is too good to be true,'' he recalled, ``to get nearly 100 times the bandwidth that we get now with our T1 line at two-thirds the cost.'' Comfort level lower Linn admits he won't have the same ``comfort level'' with a start-up that he has with Verizon, the local phone company that partnered with Internet provider Verio to provide his T1 line. But the idea of being on the Internet's frontier proved irresistible. ``We are exploring new ways of being a trade association,'' said Linn, who decided to abandon his T1 and plug in to Cogent's network. ``We did a pilot Webcasting of a local meeting last month. We want to do more of that.'' Many new carriers are selling voice as well as data services, piggybacking on the copper wires of local phone companies. Most also are handing their traffic off to national carriers like WorldCom's UUNet. Not Cogent. It bought the pair of fiber strands across 12,500 miles and spent the summer installing Cisco switching boxes in hundreds of cornfields. Schaeffer contends that running his own national network will lead to less data congestion and higher-quality service for customers. Armed with $116 million in venture funding, Cogent plans to turn on its network in Washington and three other cities in November, then expand to nine more cities by spring. So far, it has signed 473 customers in 150 buildings, mostly inner-city office complexes. Schaeffer projects his network will break even by 2003, because its data-only focus translates to equipment costs lower than those enjoyed by competitors like Qwest, Level 3 and Broadwing. They need expensive switching equipment to handle voice that Cogent doesn't require. Telephone carriers, meanwhile, dispute the notion that data-focused carriers will win the day. ``Do we feel threatened? We do, but we don't feel we are in a losing position,'' said Rahman Karrier, executive director of the Verizon division serving small and medium-size businesses. Karrier said Verizon is rolling out its own fiber initiatives, and customers eventually will want service bundles that include more than Internet access: ``The winners are going to be those companies who can deliver bandwidth in a way customers can use it to meet all of their needs.'' Cogent and its ilk may be building the next-generation Internet. How far these start-ups can get before being taken over by telecommunication heavyweights remains to be seen. But the idea they are chasing -- a network optimized for data -- seems inevitable.

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 06:54:25 -0700

To: jeff Johnston

Subject: FW: Floating Test Pad For High Tech

You may want to find out what you can about this...

Matt

-----Original Message-----

From: Poparad John T Contr AEDC/SVT

Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 6:25 AM

Subject: Floating Test Pad For High Tech

Stuart Kendrick has a Silicon Valley dream job, even though he's a captain in the Navy. Stationed aboard the Coronado, he's in charge of "innovations and experimentation": figuring out what kinds of futuristic technologies will be in ships for "the Navy after next," circa 2015 and later. Kendrick has spearheaded on-board installation of a command room that rivals the bridge of the Starship Enterprise, a "knowledge wall," a Disney-designed "creativity room," automatic language translators, a head-mounted large-screen display and a host of whiz-bang devices. The Coronado, which is at Pier 35 in San Francisco for Fleet Week, will be open to the public today only from noon to 4 p.m.; other Navy ships moored at San Francisco, Oakland and Alameda piers will be open for tours today, tomorrow and Monday. The 16,000-ton, 569-foot-long Coronado is a kind of floating test bed for cutting-edge digital tools -- in fact, the Secretary of the Navy is coming to town Monday to designate it as the Navy's official "Sea-Based Battle Lab." Kendrick, a 20-plus-year Navy veteran who's been heading an elite tech team called J9 for 18 months, sounds like a heretic by military standards. "My mission is to facilitate change in the Navy," he said, "I'm running around with an ax hacking away at the (old) legacy systems and telling people they're too slow." The Coronado has even opened its hatches to some civilian experimenters, spawning some remarkably touchy-feely projects within the ship's gray hulls. The creativity room (official name: Collaborative Planning Center), for example, was designed by Bran Ferren, an Oscar-winning special-effects creator and former executive with Walt Disney Imagineering. He used behavioral psychology to craft a space conducive to creative thoughts and group process, using curved surfaces, soft earth tones, wood grains and natural lighting. The room "allows you to think more creatively because your brain isn't cursing the stale air, bad lighting and crummy colors" of the typical Navy environment, Kendrick said. Kendrick doesn't let Navy bureaucracy or what he called "antibodies of progress" stand in his way. He navigates through red tape by ignoring it. Instead of submitting lengthy Request for Procurement forms in triplicate, "I buy a lot of stuff from Fry's in San Diego" (where the Coronado is based), he said. Buying off the shelf is revolutionary in the U.S. military, which is better known for procuring gold-plated toilets and $37 pencils. But the Navy is trying hard to catch the wave of the future. A program called Information Technology for the 21st Century, or IT-21, lets battleships run on the same tools that power the average office -- Microsoft Windows NT, for example. The goal is to get all Navy vessels to run on the same software, hardware and communications systems for increased efficiency and coordination. It sounds laudable, until you realize it means Microsoft Windows -- the same software renowned for its instability -- is at the helm of warships capable of launching nuclear missiles. Indeed, Bill Gates' software has already given Navy skippers the same kinds of headaches it dishes out to average PC users. Windows NT crashes left the missile cruiser Yorktown dead in the water -- twice. The battle cruisers Hue City and Vicksburg also were sidelined by Windows bugs. But the Coronado's technology forays have met with better success. Some of its innovations got put to the test this summer during RimPac, a multinational naval exercise in the Pacific. The Coronado set up "C-WAN" -- a wide-area network for 50 ships spread out over hundreds of miles around Hawaii. From aboard the Coronado, Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn, the commander of the U.S. 3rd Fleet, issued orders to other ships through special secure Web pages. That might sound as ho-hum as someone posting a staff list on a corporate intranet, but it's a huge breakthrough for the Navy, which has been issuing orders since World War II via the cumbersome Navy Message Track -- "Morse code to the nth degree," Kendrick said. Instead of laboriously translating orders into numeric code, the Coronado officers can import a map from the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, display it on a giant screen, scrawl an arrow and write "Bomb here" on an overlay. Meanwhile, the same image can be automatically projected on an aircraft carrier a hundred miles away. As the command and control vessel for the U.S. Third Fleet, the Coronado is the nerve center for all Navy vessels and aircraft from the West Coast to the International Dateline, an area of 50 million square miles. Its cavernous operational command center lets McGinn keep track of some 70 ships, 300 aircraft and 70,000 sailors and Marines. Commander Ellen Jewett of the J9 team transformed the ship's op center this summer, working around the clock to get it done in 19 days. Instead of 18 separate displays showing maps, photos and other data, the center is dominated by a bank of huge projection screens -- offering "a picture window into a sea of information," rather than the "portholes into an ocean of data" of the disparate displays, the Navy says. The touch-sensitive smart screens wowed the brass from other ships and will soon be installed on the 7th Fleet flagship, Blue Ridge. That's how Kendrick wants to get hot technology into the Navy -- through the back door. "It's a virus scheme; we're injecting people with good ideas," he said. "Technology breeds technology." Once innovations have become "part of the Navy DNA," Kendrick figures they'll be permanently welded into place. And there's certainly precedent for military technology experiments becoming part of the civilian world as well. Many of J9's projects are sponsored by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). DARPA's best-known previous initiative was DARPAnet, which became the modern-day Internet.

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:05:11 -0700

To: jeff Johnston , Russ White

Subject: FW: Avatars2000 Online Sunday, see you there?

FYI...

Matt

-----Original Message-----

From: Bruce Damer [mailto:bdamer@ccon.org]

Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 1:12 AM

To: bdamer@ccon.org

Subject: Avatars2000 Online Sunday, see you there?

Dear Friends in the Bay Area,

This Sunday the 15th from noon to 6pm our time here in California you will find me and several thousand other people floating about in our avatars in a large Cyberspace-station we have built in a 3D virtual world on the net. This is all part of Avatars2000, our group's 5th annual conference and the 3rd year doing it online. Its quite a new experience of the Internet so I hope you will join me! Auntie Galen will be there too, doing a special presentation on virtual worlds in healing. Its all described at:

http://www.ccon.org/conf00/html/launch.html

and preview the space station itself with screen shots at:

http://www.ccon.org/conf00/html/preview.htm

If you have a Windows PC on the net (modem OK). There will be easy instructions on the above page but all you have to do is download and install Active Worlds from: http://www.activeworlds.com enter the world and look for the signs or people to guide you to the AV00 Avatars 2000 world. There are events in other virtual world programs too, such as www.onlive.com and www.blaxxun.com. Stop in for a few minutes or the whole afternoon to experience what we feel will be a true Cyberspace for the New Millennium. If you are really ambitious you can also present a talk on any subject, hang your digital art in our galleries, broadcast your webcam, enter your avatar into the Avvy Awards and more (all sign-ups are now open at the above pages). See you in Cyberspace!

Best,

Bruce

++ The Contact Consortium ++ A Forum for Contact, Culture and Community in Digital Space Visit us at: http://www.ccon.org PO Box 66866, Scotts Valley CA USA 95067-6866 reach Bruce at work: (831) 338-9400 or at the Consortium by email at: bdamer@ccon.org /- Living, Learning and Working in Virtual Worlds

 

From: Jeff Johnston

Date: October 12, 2000

To: Apollo Harden

Subject: Underwater PC

check this out ...

http://www.herald.com/content/today/news/broward/digdocs/051752.htm

 

From: Matt Taylor

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 06:01:52 -0700

To: jeff Johnston

Subject: FW: Humor: A Mind-body Connection

A good piece to hold on to and follow up on... Matt

-----Original Message----- From: Stuart Silverstone [mailto:ss@graphics.org]

Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 4:04 AM

To: ideas@graphics.org

Subject: FWD: Humor: A Mind-body Connection

Source: http://www.the-scientist.com/yr2000/oct/rayl_p1_001002.html

Will researchers and comedy legends demonstrate laughter's therapeutic qualities?

By A.J.S. Rayl

A merry heart doeth good like a medicine, but a broken spirit dries the bone. --Proverbs 17:22 Can humor cause a positive physiological impact? Could the gags, quips, and shtick of such legends as Charlie Chaplin, Bud Abbott and Lou Costello, and the Marx Brothers, or some of today's comedians, really be medicinal? During the last couple of decades--since the best-selling author Norman Cousins made headlines by laughing himself well--researchers have been working to uncover the physiological impact of laughter at the cellular and neurochemical level. By all indications, the eons-old notion is grinning and bearing out. Cousins was diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis, a degenerative connective tissue disease. Bedridden and so weak he could barely raise his fingers, he was given a one-in-500 chance of complete recovery. He could sleep, he discovered, only after watching Marx Brothers comedies and Candid Camera episodes. It seemed to reduce his pain. Then, somehow, in the process of laughing, Cousins began to heal, eventually making an against-all-odds recovery.1,2 Now University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), cancer researchers Margaret Stuber, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, and Lonnie Zeltzer, director of the Pediatric Pain Program at Mattel Children's Hospital, have launched a five-year study--dubbed Rx Laughter--to investigate the impact of humor and laughter on the immune systems of dozens of healthy children and children confronting life-threatening diseases. The first physician-researchers to look at the impact of comedy on both healthy and sick children, Stuber and Zeltzer are calling on the talents of comedy's legendary heroes to help them out. "We're not hypothesizing that humor will be curative or that it is going to take the place of any other kind of therapy, but we [believe] that humor is going to have an additional benefit over and above simply removing or reducing stress," explains Stuber. "What I'm hoping is that we'll actually be changing the level of arousal in the autonomic nervous system, so we'll get the children to relax at that central level." Adds Zeltzer: "If you're laughing, you feel better in general. And since it elevates your mood, it should do something physically in your body to create that feeling of well-being. I think we're going to learn that exposing yourself to humor in life will not only change mood and reduce stress hormones but also influence serotonin levels, which are involved in the pain-control system. That would mean laughter could have an effect on chronic pain over time and enhance immunoreactivity, as well as help with depression and sleep and anxiety disorders." Stuber and Zeltzer will measure direct physiological responses of the autonomic nervous system. Initially, they will take low-invasive measurements of the children's heart rates, blood pressure, and stress hormones. They plan to extend the tests, adding blood surveys, among other things, to investigate the impact of humor on the immune system and on additional hormones, neurotransmitters, and natural killer (NK) cells. The researchers will also try to differentiate which comedies work best for which disorders or diseases and what types of individuals respond better to different types of humor. The Rx Laughter study will add to the positive-thinking research that has been ongoing for the last 20 years at UCLA's Norman Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, endowed by the renowned writer in the late 1970s. It will also expand on the basic science investigations of Lee S. Berk, associate director at the Center for Neuroimmunology at Loma Linda University Medical Center, also in southern California. Berk and colleagues have been at the forefront of investigating the concept of eustress, or good stress paradigms, beginning in the 1970s with studies of exercise. Actually, it was Cousins who set up Berk and colleagues with pilot study funds to begin investigating laughter as a "real eustress metaphor," says Berk. With a small cohort of mostly medical students, they established the parameters of the study and took blood samples via intravenous angiocatheters as the subjects watched a preselected, self-selected humor video, Over Your Head by comedian Gallagher (Paramount Home Video) to measure impact on the neuroendocrine system. They found that mirthful laughter--which Berk defines as "happy laughter as opposed to coping laughter or black humor or derogatory humor"--reduces stress hormone levels.3 "The neuroendocrine responses produced were opposite to what is seen in classical stress," he says. "We fell on the floor in disbelief that something from our own apothecary could actually have such an impact. This silliness is really serious stuff. It's real biology." The publication of those findings drew notable media attention, including a segment on CBS's 60 Minutes. Given that kind of notice and the age-old adage, perhaps the most surprising thing is that more researchers didn't jump on the bandwagon. "To my surprise, there are really minimal studies looking at the impact of humor on sick individuals, and nothing in children," says Zeltzer. In fact, the amount of research into eustress and positive emotions has been minimal overall. The reason, suggests Berk, "is because there were very few people who could bridge the gap across the borders of immunology, behavioral sciences, and the technologies of psychoneuroimmunology." Of course, funding was also an issue. "If you turned in a grant request for a project that crossed multiple boundaries, as I often have, nobody knew what to do with it," he adds. Berk, however, continued to add slowly to the knowledge base with his small cohort studies. Bill Marx, Harpo Marx's son, makes a "Harpo" face for Justin Ybarra, a patient at the Mattel UCLA Children's Hospital during the Rx Laughter advisory board tour in April. It Came from Hollywood If the scientific community at large was hesitating, the idea that laughter could help heal began emerging on other fronts. Rx Laughter actually came straight from Hollywood, the brainstorm of Sherry Dunay Hilber, a former ABC and CBS network programming executive who oversaw such hit sitcoms as Home Improvement, Roseanne, Coach, Who's the Boss?, and Cybill. The study even has its own Web site: www.rxlaughter.org . Hilber came up with the study idea about two years ago in the midst, she says, "of looking for some more meaningful way of using my abilities, something beyond worrying about the ratings of last night's show." She pitched her concept to Stuber and Zeltzer, who immediately came on board as the co-principal investigators and honed the study plan, and then enlisted the support of the offspring of comedy's legends. Included on Rx Laughter's Advisory Board: Josephine Chaplin, daughter of Charlie Chaplin; Chris Costello, daughter of Lou Costello; Ronald J. Fields, grandson of W.C. Fields; Melissa Talmadge Cox, the granddaughter of Buster Keaton; and Bill Marx, son of Harpo Marx of the Marx Brothers. For a scientific investigation, it is a unique teaming. But the descendants of comedy's pioneers needed no convincing. Growing up in the whirlwind shadows of their famous forebears, they learned early that comedy was a potent and powerful force. "You grow up with what you know, and I grew up with some wackos who taught me that when you have a sense of humor, you automatically have an option in your view of life," says Marx. Fields agrees and adds, "Humor is nothing but extreme positive thinking." With their support and assistance, Hilber secured all the necessary rights and permissions from the studios, free of any licensing charges--something that almost seems unbelievable. But, as Chris Costello puts it: "There are some things you just can't put a price tag on." One reason Hilber, Stuber, and Zeltzer agreed on the works of Chaplin, Costello, Fields, Keaton, and the Marx Brothers was that they had withstood the test of time. "We figured there's got to be a reason for that, and so we felt pretty safe going with those," explains Hilber. "When I was a child, I never really understood the impact of what my father did, but I was watching The King in New York recently and it is true: These films haven't gone out of date. And if they haven't gone out of date by now, they never will," says Josephine Chaplin. The Rx Laughter team also figured that these movies and shorts would serve to establish a more objective reaction, because the chances are good that most of the children have not seen many, if any, of them. For funding, Hilber contacted Comedy Central, which several years ago had established its Comedy Rx program to promote the positive effects of laughter. The cable network responded enthusiastically by putting up the initial $75,000. 'Who's on First?' The impact of laughter on the immune systems of children has "just been waiting to be tested scientifically," says Zeltzer. "It seems like such a no-brainer." The concept may be obvious enough, but designing the parameters of a study like this is most certainly not a no-brainer. Comedy is highly subjective, while science strives to be objective beyond question. The levels of complexity in a study like this are as numerous as they are intricate, and there are a lot of critical, basic questions to consider, including: * How does one determine what will be viewed as funny across the board? * Does it matter how much somebody laughs versus how funny they think something is? In other words, is the physical act of laughter an operative factor? * How does one test for differences across gender lines? Ethnicity lines? Age demographics? In adult populations, says Berk, "We learned that there are a lot of potential pitfalls in selecting comedy. Self- selection of material is important, because what is funny to one person is not necessarily funny to someone else. If you don't like slapstick, you will experience a very different biology than I would." Researchers investigating the impact of humor must also control for various other issues. "You have to be really pure when you do this kind of research," says Berk, based on his previous studies. "Our subjects [had nothing to eat or drink] for six to eight hours prior to beginning the study. They could not have exercised, or had coffee or any drugs or chocolate, and sex was not allowed." For his research, whether the subject(s) had seen the video before was less of an issue. "I'm looking for the conditioned response," he says. Actually, he found that the conditioned phenomenon is real. "In other words, we found positive effects from the anticipation." Rx Laughter is a study of children, so theoretically, the researchers will be dealing with a less socially conditioned, less biased population. Although the investigators are in the first phase of selecting the videos and finalizing study parameters, Stuber and Zeltzer have already begun initial second-phase testing on healthy children to establish a baseline. In a third phase, they will look at the impact of laughter on children with cancer, HIV, and other life-threatening diseases or disorders. "In terms of selecting the comedy videos, part of what we have been going for are things that are consistently funny and things that no parents are going to object to," says Stuber. That is actually harder than one may think. "We have to be careful, because today, in the 21st century, we have different eyes for some of these things than people might have had originally." On request from the researchers, the offspring of the legendary comedians made initial suggestions. Chaplin, for example, suggested The Circus. "I thought it was the funniest one for this project, and that's the one we offered first," she says. Costello recommended Abbott  Costello Meet Frankenstein, but then offered up all the duo's projects. Regardless of how parents might view slapstick